Objective
To study the effect of
different amount of tragacanth on the sedimentation rates of suspensions.
Introduction
Suspension is also a liquid system.Suspension
refers to a two-phase system consisting of a finely divided solid dispersed
(suspended) in a liquid (the dispersing medium). It consists of at least two
phases and forms heterogeneous systems. The continuous or external phase is
generally a liquid or a semi-solid, and the dispersed or internal phase is made
up of particulate matter, known as continuous phase. The continuous phase is
the solid material (usually the drug) which does not dissolve in the vehicle to
any appreciable extent, but remains as solid particles which are distributed
throughout the vehicle. Suspensions are intended for oral administration as
sweetened, flavored formulations or for topical application where they are
referred to as "lotions." Suspensions are also used as non-sweetened,
non-flavored formulations for many parenteral routes of administration (e.g.,
intraocular, intranasal, IV, IM, ID, SC).
Suspensions possess certain advantages over
other dosage forms. Moreover, drugs in suspension are chemically more stable
than in solution. However, suspensions also possess some disadvantages relative
to other dosage forms. The primary disadvantage is their physical instability;
i.e., that they tend to settle over time leading to a lack of uniformity of
dose. This can, however, be minimized by careful formulation and by shaking the
suspension before each dose is delivered. Therefore, the best strategy is not
to try to eliminate separation, but rather to decrease the rate of settling and
to permit easy re-suspension of any settled particulate matter. One of the
strategies is to use wetting agent like tragacanth to reduce surface
tension.
Materials
1mL graduated
pipette, pipette bulb, weighing boat, mortar and pestle, 50mL graduated
cylinder, 200mL graduated cylinder, 100mL beaker, Parafilm®, weighing boat,
viscometer.
Apparatus
Chalk,
tragacanth, concentrated peppermint water, double strength chloroform water,
distilled water, syrup BP.
Methodology
- A suspension of Pediatric Chalk Mixture (150 mL) is
prepared according to the following formula:
|
Ingredient
|
|
Suspension
|
||
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
|
Chalk (g)
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
-
|
|
Tragacanth (g)
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
0.5
|
|
Concentrated peppermint water (mL)
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
|
Syrup BP (mL)
|
15
|
15
|
15
|
15
|
|
Double Strength Chloroform water
(mL)
|
75
|
75
|
75
|
75
|
|
Distilled water q.s. (mL)
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
- 5 mL of the suspension is poured into a weighing boat
and each formulation is labelled.
The texture, clarity and colour of each suspension is observed and
compared.
- The sedimentation rate of each suspension is
determined. The suspension is shaken vigorously to make sure all of the
particles are uniformly suspended, and the time is noted. The boundary
between the sediment and the supernatant is observed and the time it takes
for the boundary to pass each 10 mL graduation until the volume of
sediment has reached 80 mL is recorded.
- The gradated cylinder is set down on the lab bench, and
the lab timer is started at this point.
- For suspensions A to D, the sedimentation volume of the
suspensions at t=0, 2, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min is recorded.
- The obtained data is recorded in the following table 1:
- The sedimentation volume ratio is calculated using the following
formula:
Sedimentation
volume ratio = Hu/Ho
Hu:
ultimate height of the sediment, i.e., the height of the sediment at a
particular time
Ho:
initial height of the total suspension
- The ease of re-dispersibility of each formulation is
determined after the last measurement. To do this:
i.
The
Parafilm® is made sure is snugged on the mouth of the graduated cylinder, and
the seal is re-enforced with gloved hand.
ii.
The
number of inversions it takes to completely re-disperse the drug is counted.
iii.
Observations
are recorded.
- 95 mL of suspension is poured into a 100 mL beaker and
the viscosity of the suspension is determined using viscometer at 100 rpm
for 30 seconds.
- The data is recorded in the following table 3:
- Each suspension is poured into a plastic bottle. After
storing all the suspensions for a period of 4 days, the ease of
re-dispersion in each system and which system is most acceptable are
determined.
Results
Table
1: Sedimentation
volume of suspensions at pre-determined time
|
Suspension
|
Sedimentation volume at
pre-determined time
(min)
|
Distinct boundary
(yes/no)
|
|||||
|
0
|
2
|
5
|
10
|
15
|
30
|
||
|
A
|
150
|
100
|
60
|
30
|
20
|
17
|
yes
|
|
B
|
150
|
130
|
80
|
32
|
28
|
24
|
no
|
|
C
|
150
|
146
|
90
|
50
|
42
|
38
|
No
|
|
D
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
no
|
Table
2: Time taken for the boundary between
sediment and supernatant to
pass each 10ml graduation
|
Sedimentation volume (mL)
|
Time taken for boundary to pass
each 10 mL graduation until the volume of sediment reached 80 mL for each
suspension (mins)
|
|||
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
|
150
|
0:00
|
0:00
|
0:00
|
-
|
|
140
|
0:30
|
1:24
|
2:00
|
-
|
|
130
|
1:20
|
1:41
|
3:15
|
-
|
|
120
|
1:37
|
2:24
|
5:21
|
-
|
|
110
|
2:22
|
2:42
|
6:40
|
-
|
|
100
|
2:49
|
3:30
|
7:20
|
-
|
|
90
|
2:55
|
4:00
|
8:33
|
-
|
|
80
|
3:02
|
6:00
|
9:36
|
-
|
Table
3: Number of inversions
needed to redisperse the drug
|
Suspension
|
Number
of Inversion needed
|
|
A
|
4
|
|
B
|
2
|
|
C
|
1
|
|
D
|
-
|
Table
4: Viscosity
of suspension
|
Suspension
|
Reading
|
Viscosity (cP)
|
Mean
|
SD
|
|
A
|
1
|
16.5
|
14.8
|
0.77
|
|
2
|
15.9
|
|||
|
3
|
12.0
|
|||
|
B
|
1
|
12.3
|
16.7
|
3.96
|
|
2
|
15.9
|
|||
|
3
|
21.9
|
|||
|
C
|
1
|
20.7
|
17.0
|
2.75
|
|
2
|
14.1
|
|||
|
3
|
16.2
|
|||
|
D
|
1
|
17.4
|
17.5
|
2.33
|
|
2
|
20.4
|
|||
|
3
|
14.7
|
Table
5: Physical appearances of all suspensions produced.
|
Suspension
|
Amount
of tragacanth (g)
|
Texture
|
Clarity
and appearance
|
Colour
of suspension
|
|
A
|
0.0
|
Less
viscous so easy to sediment and re-disperse, more watery, rough texture
|
Moderately
opaque, less cloudy, has distinct boundary layer
|
Less
milky
|
|
B
|
0.1
|
Viscous,
easy to sediment and re-disperse
|
Opaque, cloudy
|
Milky
white
|
|
C
|
0.3
|
Viscous,
less easier to sediment and re-disperse
|
Opaque,
more cloudy
|
Milky
white
|
|
D
|
0.5
|
Highly
viscous, smooth texture
|
Translucent,
not cloudy
|
Brownish
colour
|
Discussion
1.
Compare
and discuss physical appearances of all the suspensions produced.
The
varying the amount of tragacanth gives different physical appearances of
suspension in those formulations. Tragacanth is a suspending agent which
decrease interfacial tension between solid particle and liquid from continuous
phase. As
the amount of tragacanth added to the formulation is increased, it increases
the viscosity of suspension and thus slowing down the sedimentation of
particles within suspension in accordance
with Stokes Law. It also helps prevent caking at the bottom besides to
facilitate redistribution of a suspension on shaking and provides ‘structure’ to the medium in order to support
the suspensoid. Besides, the formulation will be more opaque and cloudy.
This is because the suspension stays disperse in the medium for a longer time
compared to the formulation without Tragacanth.
This will allow the pharmaceutical product to be withdrawn from the container
to be consumed by the consumer.
When amount of the tragacanth
is zero, the clarity of the solution is very clear due to the lesser amount of
particles dispersed in liquid medium. The product appears to be separated in two layers
with clear boundary whereby the dispersed phase seems to sediment at the bottom
of the container.
However, with suspending agents, it will cause disperse particles to suspense
in the medium for longer duration and homogenous white chalky colour can be
directly observed. The suspension is said to be opaque and cloudy.
To conclude, the texture of
the suspension become more concentrated which directly proportional to the
amount of tragacanth that had been added.
2.
Plot
Hu/Ho vs. time for each of the suspensions (Table 1) Discuss the findings.
|
Time (min)
|
Sedimentation
volume ratio Hu/Ho
|
|||
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
|
2
|
0.66
|
0.86
|
0.97
|
-
|
|
5
|
0.40
|
0.53
|
0.60
|
-
|
|
10
|
0.20
|
0.21
|
0.33
|
-
|
|
15
|
0.13
|
0.19
|
0.28
|
-
|
|
30
|
0.11
|
0.16
|
0.25
|
-
|
From this graph,
we can conclude that as the amount of tragacanth increases, the lower the
sediment formed and time for sedimentation to occur is longer. In this
experiment, as the time increases, the sedimentation start to occur due to the
inter-particular attractive forces are stronger than the repulsive forces of the
tragacanth powder. Suspension which contain more tragacanth is more stable as
tragacanth act as the suspending agent.
For suspension A,
it contain less tragacanth than B and C. Thus, it takes short time to form
sediment. The amount of tragacanth in C is more than in B which is 0.5g of
tragacanth. Thus, it takes longer time to form sediment than B. For suspension
D, it does not contain chalk eventhough it contains 0.5g of tragacanth. So,
there is no sedimentation occur because there is no reaction between the chalk
and the tragacanth.
3.
Briefly
explain the principle of analysis using viscometer. Plot the viscosity vs
tragacanth content (Table 4). Discuss the findings.
A
viscometer is an instrument used to measure the viscosity of a fluid.
Viscometers only measure under one flow condition. There are different types of
viscometer which are rotational viscometer, vibrational viscometer, oscillating
viscometer, falling piston viscometer and falling sphere viscometer. The one
that is being used in this experiment is rotational viscometer.
Rotational
viscometer gathers data on a material’s viscosity behavior under different
conditions. The rotational viscometer basically consists of two parts which are
a head unit with a motor and a spindle that is driven by the motor. The
viscosity is determined by measuring the resistance of a spindle rotating in
the sample. Viscosity can be thought of similar to a coefficient of friction.
The viscosity of the fluid produces drag, which means more force is required to
produce motion. In an ideal situation with one plate stationary, one plate
moving, and a film of fluid between them the force required to cause motion
is:
F = (mu) (A) (u / y)
Where F is the force, mu is dynamic viscosity, A is the area of the plates, u is the speed, and y is the distance between plates. If we rearrange the equation,
mu = (F*y)/(A*u)
A rotational viscometer uses this principle, and this equation (modified for rotation) to calculate a fluid's viscosity. A probe consisting of a fixed element and a rotating element (like the plates in the ideal example) are placed in the fluid. The moving probe is turned at a constant speed, equivalent to u in the equation. There is a sensor in the viscometer to read the amount of torque that the fluid is pushing back with. It takes all of these parameters and crunches a version of the equation above to provide viscosity measurement.
F = (mu) (A) (u / y)
Where F is the force, mu is dynamic viscosity, A is the area of the plates, u is the speed, and y is the distance between plates. If we rearrange the equation,
mu = (F*y)/(A*u)
A rotational viscometer uses this principle, and this equation (modified for rotation) to calculate a fluid's viscosity. A probe consisting of a fixed element and a rotating element (like the plates in the ideal example) are placed in the fluid. The moving probe is turned at a constant speed, equivalent to u in the equation. There is a sensor in the viscometer to read the amount of torque that the fluid is pushing back with. It takes all of these parameters and crunches a version of the equation above to provide viscosity measurement.
Tragacanth is a
suspending agent that is used to suspend the chalk powder in this experiment.
As we can see, if more amount of tragacanth is used, the viscosity of the
suspension will increase. From the graph plotted, when there is no tragacanth
in the suspension, the average viscosity of the suspension formulation is 14.8
cP meanwhile when we put 0.5 g of tragacanth in a different formulation, the
average viscosity of the formulation is higher which is 17.5 cP. Thus,
suspension formulation A with 0.0 g tragacanth used has the lowest viscosity
while formulation E with 0.5 g of tragacanth used has the highest viscosity. As
a conclusion, the viscosity of the suspension is proportional to the amount of
suspending agent added into the system.
4.
After
storing the suspensions for a period of 4 days, determine the ease of
redispersion of each.
After 4 days of
storing, suspension A is the easiest to redisperse because it does not contain
tragacanth, then it is followed by suspension B and suspension C. Higher amount
of Tragacanth powder in suspension will make the suspension difficult to be
redispersed.
5. Based on all the
observations, which product would be considered to be most acceptable? Explain.
Tragacanth acts as a suspending agent. Hence, the more
tragacanth powder will form less sediment and less flocculation. At the same
time, the more tragacanth powder will produce suspension which is stable,
smooth and cloudy. In this experiment, suspension C is the most stable
suspension because it has more tragacanth and more sendiment is formed. Also,
the results show that suspension C takes longer time for sendimentation to
occur.
6.
Briefly
explain the function of each excipients used in the suspension formulation.
Explain the influence of tragacanth on the physical characteristics and
stability of a suspension.
|
Chalk
|
Active ingredient which acts as absorbent
and antacid for treatment of diarrhea.
|
|
Tragacanth
|
Suspending agent to suspend and stabilise the chalk in the
suspension by decreasing interfacial tension between solid particle and
liquid from continuous phase.
|
|
Concentrated Peppermint Water
|
Flavouring agent to increase
patient acceptance
|
|
Syrup BP
|
Sweetening agent to make more palatable
Co-solvent and thickening agent to make suspension more viscous and
decrease sedimentation rate for easier re-dispersing ability and prevent
crystallisation
|
|
Double Strength Chloroform Water
|
Preservative, flavouring agent and solvent
|
|
Distilled Water
|
Diluents in suspension
Acts as vehicle of mixture carrying pharmaceutical active
ingredients to patient’s body
|
Tragacanth functions as the suspending and thickening agent, which
increases the viscosity of the suspension or any aqueous vehicle thus slowing
down the rate of sedimentation of the suspended particles as per Stoke’s law.
As in this experiment, chalk is non diffusible particles so by adding the
tragacanth it will help to make the chalk remain dispersed for longer time throughout the suspension. Thereby, no
distinct layers are present. It also appears more cloudy and smooth.
Too high in viscosity of a suspension will result in difficulty to
pour the suspension out of the mouth bottle, therefore we also have to
maintain the viscosity of the suspension at optimum range to provide its good
flow.
Tragacanth changes the conformation on the surface and transforms
flocculated particles into deflocculated particles spontaneously when changing
of pH occurs. If pH changes, the stability of suspension also occurs due to
presence of steric repulsion force. It will form a film layer, as well as coat around particle and decrease the
inter-particle attraction.
The stability and physical characteristics of suspension depends on
the different amount of tragacanth used in formulation. As the amount of
tragacanth used increased, the suspension will become more viscous and stable
against coagulation.
Conclusion
The amount of
Tragacanth used in suspension affects the rate of sendimentation and the height
of sendiment formed. The higher the amount of Tragacanth powder, the lower the
rate and height of sendimentation. Besides, Tragacanth powder also increases
the viscosity of suspension formulation. The suspension with higher amount of
Tragacanth is the more stable suspension. However, too much Tragacanth powder
will cause the suspension more difficult to be redispersed. Hence, the amount
of Tragacanth in suspension formulation should be moderate.
References:
1. Michael E.Aulton, Aulton’s Pharmaceutics The
Design And Manufacture of Medicines, third edition, 2007, Churchill Livingstone
Elsevier
2. Patrick J. Sinko, Phd, Martin’s Physical
Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sixth Edition, 2006, Wolters Kulwer.
3. John F. Marriott, Pharmaceutical Compounding
And Dispensing, 2006, Pharmaceutical Press Sdn Bhd


No comments:
Post a Comment